1 resultado para Process Chemistry and Technology
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (3)
- Aquatic Commons (7)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (70)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (53)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (46)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (11)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (111)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (61)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (26)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (209)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (143)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (73)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
Resumo:
We assess different policies for reducing carbon dioxide emissions and promoting innovation and diffusion of renewable energy. We evaluate the relative performance of policies according to incentives provided for emissions reduction, efficiency, and other outcomes. We also assess how the nature of technological progress through learning and research and development (R&D), and the degree of knowledge spillovers, affects the desirability of different policies. Due to knowledge spillovers, optimal policy involves a portfolio of different instruments targeted at emissions, learning, and R&D. Although the relative cost of individual policies in achieving reductions depends on parameter values and the emissions target, in a numerical application to the U.S. electricity sector, the ranking is roughly as follows: (1) emissions price, (2) emissions performance standard, (3) fossil power tax, (4) renewables share requirement, (5) renewables subsidy, and (6) R&D subsidy. Nonetheless, an optimal portfolio of policies achieves emissions reductions at a significantly lower cost than any single policy. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.